| 1 |
On 22/02/12 00:38, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Pacho Ramos<pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> As looks like fixing old grub is far away because nobody know what is |
| 4 |
>> causing that issues, probably trying to get grub-1.99 ready for |
| 5 |
>> stabilization would be interesting (we will need to do that sooner or |
| 6 |
>> later anyway) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Ubuntu has used grub2 for 3 years, I am considering working on making |
| 9 |
> it stable for at least x86 / amd64. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
That's good news. I think Gentoo has a policy on not providing |
| 12 |
unmaintained software in the tree (they're getting tree cleaned.) Given |
| 13 |
that Grub 1 is both beta software (it got stuck at 0.97, never made it |
| 14 |
to 1.0) and unmaintained, stabilizing Grub 2 ASAP is the sanest thing |
| 15 |
you can do, since even though it's also beta software, it's at least |
| 16 |
maintained by upstream. |
Archives