Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Subject: Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:16:44 +0300
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Auke Booij wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
> > Thoughts?
> 
> If Gentoo doesn't seem to have time to maintain the stable tree, why
> have it in the first place? What really is the advantage of having a
> stable tree?
> 
What? I am talking about exotic arches and I didn't say to drop to
entire stable tree. Just to shrink it in order to keep it up to date
more easily
-- 
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Attachment:
pgpfk1uAgoMKy.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Auke Booij
References:
Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Markos Chandras
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Auke Booij
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Next by thread:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages
Next by date:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.