| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Due to bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417117 |
| 5 |
it seems the situation on this topic is unclear. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I myself don't have a problem with getting my ebuilds reviewed if the |
| 8 |
herd requires that before I commit them and have done this already a |
| 9 |
few times. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
More eyes/maintainers means higher quality IMO. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
However I didn't get a definite answer if it's actually a REQUIREMENT |
| 14 |
to get a review by a herd, especially when you do not plan to add that |
| 15 |
herd to metadata.xml and plan to maintain the ebuild on your own. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
This seems to be especially controversial regarding games in the main |
| 18 |
tree (I myself always join #gentoo-games anyway and discuss the |
| 19 |
ebuilds there). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
What's the official policy, so everyone can be clear about this? |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPwCTCAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz+ZUIAJuZvONQkoVHAFC+HPEdMnui |
| 27 |
/HTcNQC04RaS3TGHo3AdNRyYczTOfK0IjtMsktL+TcKlNgXRSNp+F6Tb7jakeH4G |
| 28 |
utXegWJnziKcJtFxvAyNB8rh0QP5AxrdZjzIddRz58UcarhzyH5f8z8v0uLESg78 |
| 29 |
ifwuH1Em97HoGVVvFE7U00C0BJSSyNmCxLiMgdxCKD3hmy7hgH+N4X+rKPDnBsnh |
| 30 |
jK6BbOPQCUBHiiCWOgK8yJDShq79U0no5E0gzfSJQBXlTu4xqvyITYnEj5OMUfW9 |
| 31 |
M3s3uRBZmkvRf9qLB9rF0ud0fKEQj5Kde4toroNalrsoljh/Jgz/ErZADU8WJtg= |
| 32 |
=0tqO |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives