Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please stop requesting keywords for arches you don't have
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:07:16
Message-Id: 8b4c83ad0907121101g18fe0827l6071acb7a91eefc2@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Please stop requesting keywords for arches you don't have by "Raúl Porcel"
1 On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Raúl Porcel<armin76@g.o> wrote:
2 > Also, *STOP* dropping keywords when a new dependency isn't keyworded
3 > without filing a bug for that architecture.
4 >
5
6 Towards reducing arch load, I say that new packages should not be
7 added to ~arch if some of it's new dependencies are not keyworded. Add
8 p.masked or keyword-less till dependencies are keyworded. *Then* add
9 to ~arch carrying over keywords.
10
11 Although I'm not an arch tester myself, I empathize with the huge
12 amount of work they have to do. This will reduce workload for arch
13 teams greatly
14
15 Example: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268529 <-- libsoup
16 keywords dropped because of new dependency libproxy. This led to a
17 cascade of packages with dropped keywords -->
18 http://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=268529
19
20 This could've been worse, and likely will be worse with GNOME 2.28 and 3.0 :)
21
22 --
23 ~Nirbheek Chauhan

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Please stop requesting keywords for arches you don't have Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>