Archives
Archives
| From: | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Devmanual text on ChangeLogs | ||
| Date: | Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:01:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4DBBD02B.3060909@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Devmanual text on ChangeLogs by "Petteri Räty" |
||
| 1 | On 04/30/2011 11:46 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 | > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > There doesn't seem to be a common opinion on what the policy for |
| 5 | > ChangeLog entries is. See: |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f829da2375f1ceab766a800913cc4998.xml |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > I propose a simple new text: "Every commit should have an entry in |
| 10 | > ChangeLog." If we eventually autogenerate them from git logs this would |
| 11 | > happen any way (unless some kind of filtering system is in the middle) |
| 12 | > so we could already start now. I think it's better to have more than |
| 13 | > less information available to users. |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > Regards, |
| 16 | > Petteri |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | |
| 19 | "Every new file, and modification to existing file should have an entry |
| 20 | in ChangeLog." to skip the proper ChangeLog-less removals. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Devmanual text on ChangeLogs | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Devmanual text on ChangeLogs | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Devmanual text on ChangeLogs | Panagiotis Christopoulos <pchrist@g.o> |