Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/dev-libs/libffi: ChangeLog libffi-3.0.10_rc8.ebuild libffi-3.0.9.ebuild
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:38:28
Message-Id: 20110908133750.GL32672@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/dev-libs/libffi: ChangeLog libffi-3.0.10_rc8.ebuild libffi-3.0.9.ebuild by Markos Chandras
1 On 08-09-2011 16:16:36 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
2 > The changelog entry message is irrelevant in this case since the
3 > changelog already lists which files were removed ( -foo-1 -foo-2 ) so
4 > please don't make us restart the old discussion about changelogs which
5 > will lead us again to nasty and undesired results. Moreover I haven't
6 > seen you complaining about my Changelogs either ( I use a bare "^"
7 > when removing ebuilds )
8
9 > so instead of recycling old threads, please
10 > lets move forward and deal with the auto-generated changelogs once and
11 > for all.
12
13 ... in which these useless messages will show up, as decided by the
14 Council in their last meeting. So also to you, please write a sensical
15 commit message, please, or just don't make a separate commit for
16 removals, which avoids the entire problem. (Weren't you both
17 complaining about the speed of echangelog and repoman commit?)
18
19
20 --
21 Fabian Groffen
22 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature