Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:10:51
Message-Id: 20091221122209.GB3308@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date by Richard Freeman
1 On 21-12-2009 06:30:23 -0500, Richard Freeman wrote:
2 > On 12/21/2009 02:54 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
3 > > If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to
4 > > -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o
5 > > would also have the original "January 2010 meeting date" mail in the
6 > > thread on -dev.
7 >
8 > Or you could just subscribe to both and add this to your procmailrc:
9 >
10 > :0 Wh: msgid.lock
11 > | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
12 >
13 > :0 a:
14 > .duplicates/new
15
16 Does that fix archives.g.o? No.
17
18 > Cross-posting in general tends to mess up threads, but there isn't much
19 > that can be done about that unless we just ban it. However, most
20 > cross-posts are honest attempts to try to move list discussion to a
21 > place where it might better belong.
22
23 For commits I can imagine, but for this, it's just pointless.
24
25
26 --
27 Fabian Groffen
28 Gentoo on a different level