| 1 |
On 2 August 2010 22:40, Matti Bickel <mabi@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/02/2010 08:16 PM, David Leverton wrote: |
| 3 |
>> If so, it sounds like what you really want is per-package eclasses |
| 4 |
>> (maybe with elibs as well to hold the non-metadata code), which |
| 5 |
>> aren't covered by GLEP33 but ought to be easy enough to add. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It's actually covered by GLEP33: |
| 8 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0033.html#tree-restructuring |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I interpreted that more as a way to organise the global eclasses, but |
| 11 |
yes, it could be used for per-package stuff too. I'd still prefer to |
| 12 |
have the eclasses next to the ebuilds they're meant to be used by, but |
| 13 |
that's just a detail (and as I say, could easily be added to the GLEP |
| 14 |
if anyone else wants it). |
Archives