| 1 |
> KDE really needs to step up and get KDE 4.6.x stabilization bug open, |
| 2 |
> and this non-issue would become moot ;-) |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
True, we'd also have a new stable KDE rather sooner than later. It's only |
| 5 |
limited fun if upstream considers your stable version dead. :| |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
4.6.0 looked OK for a .0 release, some regressions compared to 4.5.5 |
| 8 |
4.6.1 introduced a lot of regressions compared to _4.6.0_! |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
One possible cause for this might be that upstream was (and still is) in the |
| 11 |
middle of the svn -> git migration, and that the 4.6.1 tarballs were pieced |
| 12 |
together "by hand" from different repositories... (*) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Anyway. 4.6.2 will be tagged on thursday, and we hope this is going to be a |
| 15 |
worthy stable candidate. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
(and no, afaic that does not include kdepim...) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
(*) |
| 20 |
The discussion for 4.6.1: |
| 21 |
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2011-February/004572.html |
| 22 |
The ongoing discussion for 4.6.2: |
| 23 |
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2011-March/004619.html |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 28 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 29 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 30 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives