| 1 |
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 25 May 2012 18:12, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Actually, Alec's question is not so far-fetched. The Gentoo Social |
| 5 |
>> Contract says that Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software |
| 6 |
>> unless it is open source. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Though in the case of github, gentoo is not "depending upon it". |
| 10 |
> Github could die in a ball of fire, and it wouldn't change the core |
| 11 |
> development, it would only change the development for the people who |
| 12 |
> elected to use github. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This thread has had many suggestions about how things might be laid |
| 15 |
out. For instance I think it would be against our social contract to |
| 16 |
host the master git tree on github as someone suggested earlier in the |
| 17 |
thread. My intent was mostly to keep the contract in mind when coming |
| 18 |
up with such solutions. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Anyone can use any git platform that competes with github, be it |
| 22 |
> bitbucket, gitorious, or a private git server they created. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Github is just a convenient go-to service for many. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Kent |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
| 30 |
> 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |
| 33 |
> |
Archives