| 1 |
2011/6/26 Jesús J. Guerrero Botella <jesus.guerrero.botella@×××××.com>: |
| 2 |
> I am really amazed that someone didn't want to use links (a solution |
| 3 |
> with next to zero work involved) because they are not available in |
| 4 |
> fat32 (as if fat32 was relevant at all for us) but then people is |
| 5 |
> suggesting that we should put everything into a flat folder and use |
| 6 |
> tags. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Well, the difference being "Symlinks are only really surplus utilities |
| 9 |
that make it easier for users" and "Some degree of backcompat" instead |
| 10 |
of "Core Functionality that will be required to make the code work". |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
In theory, if you have the "most recent" versions of your package |
| 13 |
manager, after this change takes place, you will not need any symlinks |
| 14 |
at all, and functionality should still be retained if they were blown |
| 15 |
out completely. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Kent |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
| 25 |
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |
Archives