Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: jim_ramsay@g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-plugins/adobe-flash: metadata.xml adobe-flash-11.2.202.228.ebuild ChangeLog
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 15:25:13
Message-Id: CAEdQ38FB2ktdnbVUUsEa-cde-3i=uWUc0cR8EbS5RS5__iTLCA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-plugins/adobe-flash: metadata.xml adobe-flash-11.2.202.228.ebuild ChangeLog by Christian Ruppert
1 On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert <idl0r@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 04/26/12 at 06:00PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
3 >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:04:08 -0600
4 >> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote:
5 >>
6 >> > Arg, no.  Please just print the warning if the host doesn't do SSE2.
7 >> > There's no reason to have a USE flag here (and _really_ no reason to
8 >> > make it fatal)
9 >>
10 >> I entirely agree there. :)
11 >>
12 >
13 > I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a USE flag for
14 > SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global..
15 >
16 >> > , especially for an instruction set that every system has supported
17 >> > for over a decade.
18 >>
19 >> Er, some of my teenage systems run desktops just fine here, thanks. And
20 >> one of them is just nine years old right now but still doesn't support
21 >> SSE2 (merely SSE[1]).
22 >>
23 >>
24 >> Regards,
25 >>      jer
26 >>
27 >>
28 >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Athlon_XP#Barton_and_Thorton - see
29 >>     [2] right above that for the actual specs.
30 >> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Athlon_XP#Thoroughbred_.28T-Bred.29
31 >>
32 >
33 > --
34 > Regards,
35 > Christian Ruppert
36 > Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure member
37 > Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7C84 B274 6C59 F243 5EAB 0C62 B427 ABC8
38
39 Jim?

Replies