Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:32:31
Message-Id: 1246278746.31661.248.camel@liasis.inforead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections by Dale
1 On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 18:12 -0500, Dale wrote:
2 > Roy Bamford wrote:
3 > >
4 > >
5 > > You agree that common sense can't be used and admit that a corner case
6 > > exists that would in effect have the trustees pointing out to the
7 > > council that they had made an error of judgement and need to reverse a
8 > > decision that the last meeting made. I would prefer never to have to go
9 > > there.
10 > >
11 > > I do not agree that an all proxy council meeting shows that the council
12 > > does not take its responsibilities very seriously, rather that real
13 > > life has hit everyone at the same time and they have appointed
14 > > proxies. GLEP39 does not even set a limit on the maximum number of
15 > > council members who may be proxied at any single meeting.
16 > >
17 > > As I have already said, I'm against the idea of proxies altogether.
18 > > We should amend glep39 to remove proxies and ensure that council
19 > > members are drawn from the developer community. Of course, that
20 > > does not eliminate the possibility of the trustees pointing out to the
21 > > council that they need to reverse a decision but it does ensure that
22 > > decisions are made only by council members who are Gentoo developers.
23 > >
24 >
25 > I'm just picking a random message so no fingers being pointed here.
26 >
27 > As a long time Gentoo user, I have to ask. Why is that EVERYONE on the
28 > council must be there or have someone there to represent them? Would
29 > Gentoo come to a end if one person or even two people were not present?
30 >
31 All that's required is a quorum (4 out of 7) to hold a meeting.
32
33 > I do agree that if a proxy is going to be used, they should be a
34 > developer. If it is not that way now, it should be changed. I been
35 > using Gentoo for years and wouldn't even consider serving as a proxy. I
36 > would certainly not want to be a tie breaker on a vote.
37 >
38 > As a American that sees his own country's government getting out of
39 > control, never count on common sense. Elected people rarely have any.
40 > If they do during the election, it disappears after taking their
41 > position. I think the vast majority of people here have seen that over
42 > the years.
43 >
44 > My $0.02 worth.
45 >
46 > Dale
47 >
48 > :-) :-)
49
50 Regards,
51 Ferris
52 --
53 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
54 Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>