Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:58:29
Message-Id: 4F85E21C.4060106@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012 by Steven J Long
1 On 04/11/2012 07:13 AM, Steven J Long wrote:
2 > Zac Medico wrote:
3 >
4 >> On 04/10/2012 07:28 PM, Steven J Long wrote:
5 >>> I suppose you could script that, but again, it just seems like a lot of
6 >>> bother to implement an "alternative" that doesn't actually gain anything
7 >>> over the traditional setup (plus making sure that partitions are mounted
8 >>> before udev starts.)
9 >>
10 >> At least in the case of udev, we gain from not having to maintain a fork.
11 >>
12 > "Making sure that partitions are mounted before udev starts" is a lot less
13 > of an ask than setting up an initramfs, and changing the way we've worked
14 > for years. It's what you proposed: an earlymounts init script, or patches to
15 > Gentoo initscripts to do the same thing. Neither involves any patches to
16 > udev proper, so no fork needs to be maintained.
17
18 It's not generally practical to do mounts prior to starting udev, since
19 udev can may be needed to create the device nodes that are needed for
20 for performing the mounts. Maybe a subset of users can get away with it
21 by relying on devtmpfs and having the drivers built into the kernel, but
22 that won't work for everyone.
23 --
24 Thanks,
25 Zac

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012 Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>