Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog g
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:21:16
Message-Id: 4F19DAA9.1060000@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog g by Hilco Wijbenga
1 On 01/20/2012 01:12 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
2 > On 20 January 2012 12:31, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On 01/20/2012 10:28 AM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
4 >>> I'd like to chime in here. I started a thread on gentoo-user (Portage
5 >>> option "--changed-use" not working?) pretty much about this.
6 >>>
7 >>> I use --changed-use instead of --newuse to get the advantages of a
8 >>> fully up-to-date system without the unnecessary churn. From the man
9 >>> page I understand that (part of) the idea behind --changed-use is to
10 >>> *not* rebuild packages where an unused/disabled USE flag is dropped.
11 >>> Which ought to apply to kdeenablefinal, right?
12 >>>
13 >>> It seems my understanding is incorrect because I see --new-use +
14 >>> --exclude is being recommended, not --changed-use. Would somebody
15 >>> please set me straight?
16 >
17 > You prefer/recommend --new-use + --exclude over --changed-use?
18
19 It depends on your goal, because the results are different.
20 --
21 Thanks,
22 Zac