Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-core@g.o, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] xmms-arts masked, kvirc may follow
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 21:23:53
Message-Id: 20030405212350.GA26674@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] xmms-arts masked, kvirc may follow by Dan Armak
1 On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 12:15:03AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > Hello everyone,
6 >
7 [snip]
8 >
9 > kvirc: this also has had several distinct bugreports which I have been unable
10 > to resolve, and I may well have to mask it soon.
11 > The 2.x and 3.x tres each have their own problems. Upstream development seems
12 > slow, judging by the rate of cvs commits - at least it did last time I looked
13 > at the kvirc cvs (no cvsweb interface, unfortunately). If someone here knows
14 > what goes on inside kvirc, please don't get angry at me for saying that -
15 > rather help us fix the problems so that I don't have to mask it too. We've
16 > received more (distinct) bugreports for kvirc than for just about any other
17 > kde app. A query of bugzilla for bugs having 'kvirc' in their topic returns
18 > 14 results.
19
20 I did a query for open bugs with 'kvirc' in the summary and came up with
21 five... I don't know kvirc either, so I can't offer much help with
22 those, though.
23
24
25 --
26 Jon Portnoy
27 avenj/irc.freenode.net
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list