1 |
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:55:40 +0200 |
2 |
Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Friday 24 of June 2011 09:55:19 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:52:03 +0200 |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Jesús J. Guerrero Botella <jesus.guerrero.botella@×××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
> > > You might not like it, but Gentoo categories have always been |
9 |
> > > directories, not words into metadata.xml. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > So tags are in some way related to categories then? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> IMHO the best approach is to forget about categories and: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> - make package names unique identifiers (it's not that hard, renaming |
16 |
> stuff in app-xemacs mostly) - categories would serve no purpose as id |
17 |
> anymore (though may need to be provided as backward compatibility - |
18 |
> but with symlinks to ebuilds/${PN} inside) |
19 |
|
20 |
And we'll all be doing a lot of ugly ${PN/python-/} and so on. Simplify |
21 |
things, not make harder just because of some wannabe tag fashion. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best regards, |
25 |
Michał Górny |