Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@g.o>
Subject: Moving more hardening features to default?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:47:14 +0200
I've noticed
<http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags>, i.e.
Debian is starting to make more and more hardening features default, at
least for most packages.

Should we start doing that too? What are possible problems with that? It
seems like it's mostly about USE=hardened, right?

I've noticed that several binary drivers like nvidia-drivers are masked
on hardened - is it a problem with hardened-sources, or with hardened
toolchain?

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
Replies:
Re: Moving more hardening features to default?
-- Kacper Kowalik
Re: Moving more hardening features to default?
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: Moving more hardening features to default?
-- Anthony G. Basile
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
dev-python/pygobject slotting
Next by thread:
Re: Moving more hardening features to default?
Previous by date:
Re: huse: new helper for low level eclass writers
Next by date:
Re: Moving more hardening features to default?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.