From: | "Paweł Hajdan |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? |
Date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:48:07 |
Message-Id: | 4E9FE012.5080703@gentoo.org |
1 | I've noticed |
2 | <http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags>, i.e. |
3 | Debian is starting to make more and more hardening features default, at |
4 | least for most packages. |
5 | |
6 | Should we start doing that too? What are possible problems with that? It |
7 | seems like it's mostly about USE=hardened, right? |
8 | |
9 | I've noticed that several binary drivers like nvidia-drivers are masked |
10 | on hardened - is it a problem with hardened-sources, or with hardened |
11 | toolchain? |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? | Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@g.o> |