Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:07:28 +0100
On Thursday 27 November 2008, Duncan wrote:

> In that case, it may be better to do the limited code duplication,
> given the relative permanence of eclasses.

So, what is it we're short of? Developer time or harddrive space? Is our 
problem that our packages start to bitrot or that we have huge number 
of bitrotting eclasses?
Just saying.

-- 
/PA
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
References:
Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass
-- Peter Alfredsen
Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass
-- Duncan
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass
Next by thread:
Linux 2.6.27 stabilisation plans
Previous by date:
Re: [gentoo-council] Nominations open for 1 council slot - 48 hours left
Next by date:
RFC: DEFINED_PHASES magic metadata variable


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.