Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass | ||
| Date: | Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:09:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200811270607.42421.loki_val@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: gtk-sharp-module.eclass by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Thursday 27 November 2008, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > In that case, it may be better to do the limited code duplication, |
| 4 | > given the relative permanence of eclasses. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | So, what is it we're short of? Developer time or harddrive space? Is our |
| 7 | problem that our packages start to bitrot or that we have huge number |
| 8 | of bitrotting eclasses? |
| 9 | Just saying. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | /PA |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |