From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash | ||
Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:01:16 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120312155927.2cca0d3b@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash by Kent Fredric |
1 | On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:57:04 +1300 |
2 | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > I think this notion should be concluded before we continue debating as |
4 | > to how best to implement EAPI declarations. |
5 | > |
6 | > Is it really so fixed that ".ebuild" will only ever be bash ? |
7 | |
8 | What version of bash are we talking about here? It's not the case that |
9 | ebuilds will always be bash 3, which is enough to make GLEP 55 the safe |
10 | option. |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |