| 1 |
On 03/13/2012 07:01 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> With respect; you're proposing we go gum up version parsing via |
| 3 |
> shoving EAPI directly into it. Literally, make what is already a |
| 4 |
> complex mess, worse. Apply some KISS to your proposal please. ;) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Just hammering the point home; compatibility *is* complex. Claiming |
| 7 |
> otherwise is naive. Case in point: your proposal breaks the shit out |
| 8 |
> of any current-day package manager that saw such a filename. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'm not really interested in GLEP 55 or variants of it. I was just |
| 11 |
saying that if we do go with a GLEP 55 variant, then I'd prefer one |
| 12 |
that's similar to the "EAPI in the filename with one-time extension |
| 13 |
change" option [1]. There are plenty of ways to do that without making |
| 14 |
it difficult to separate the EAPI from the version part. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
[1] |
| 17 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0055.html#eapi-in-the-filename-with-one-time-extension-change |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Thanks, |
| 20 |
Zac |
Archives