Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 11/26/11 12:26 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> If it should be sorted[1], it should really be sorted in the reverse
> order of distfile-download size. That would be extremely useful on
> systems with slow internet connections. [...]
>
> 1. I'm obviously assuming that dep nodes that do not depend on each
> other would be sorted
Seconded. I think practical reasons are more important than an arbitrary
order, and I'd also benefit from this download-oriented order.
|
|
