Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
Subject: RFC: 0-day bump requests
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
     Hi fellow developers,


it seems I've run into a minor issue with fellow bug wrangler carlo
(who has been putting a lot of work into that, for which we should all
be grateful).

Carsten has a cut-and-paste message that he posts in comments to
version bump bug reports that he finds have been filed on the day the
software version in question was released/announced. The gist of the
message is that none of or most ebuild developers do not like these
"0-day requests" and that users (and developers) should refrain from
filing them on the same day. Waiting a week would be OK, the message
seems to say.

Being an ebuild developer myself, I have to say that I do not hold that
stance and that I welcome early version bump requests. Therefore, I
refrain from adding such messages to the bugs that I wrangle and indeed
welcome any bump requests[1].

Finding myself in conflict with someone I have come to share a certain
workload with, notably someone who has a few more years of Gentoo
experience, I wonder what the majority of our ebuild developers
actually think. In that spirit, I hope the following questions are
neutral enough for everyone to *not* start a flamewar over this. :)


-----
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?


2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
version bump requests?


-----

I know, it's not a particularly good survey, but I hope the plenty and
diversity of your answers will shed more light on the matter. :)


Thank you and kind regards,
     JeR


[1] In fact I regularly use the opportunity to check on the HOMEPAGE
whether the release was security related, and I assign directly to
security@ when that is the case (CC'ing the package's maintainers) and
perhaps pasting ChangeLog or advisory info in a comment.
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Jim Ramsay
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Luca Barbato
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Ferris McCormick
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Petteri Räty
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Sven Köhler
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Luis Francisco Araujo
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Marius Mauch
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
-- Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Bugzilla muckup
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests
Previous by date:
Re: Re: [v3] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs
Next by date:
Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.