Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: phajdan.jr@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of <net-print/foo2zjs-99999999 (earlier versions are fubar)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:08:20
Message-Id: 20110602185111.3a84bc14@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of by "Paweł Hajdan
1 On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:20:41 +0200
2 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > The upstream doesn't support snapshots of the tarball, and claims the
5 > auxiliary files cannot be redistributed.
6 >
7 > I think the best course of action is to leave just the live ebuild
8 > (I'm using it on one system that has a printer that requires it).
9
10 I think it may be useful to have a snapshot anyway. If you can't
11 tarball it, maybe a tagged VCS ebuild? I'm not sure if such a thing is
12 supposed to lie unmasked in the tree but it's better than no non-live
13 ebuild.
14
15 --
16 Best regards,
17 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies