| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 14/06/12 10:43 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 06/15/2012 05:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On Thursday 14 June 2012 21:16:31 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> So how about renaming USE="gs" consumers to USE="ps" and making |
| 8 |
>>> USE="ps" global flag with the proposed description? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> merging is a good idea. getting away from "ghostscript" is good. |
| 11 |
>> i might suggest expanding "ps" to "postscript" though as "ps" is |
| 12 |
>> a bit generic ... -mike |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> well, I admit I was sort of trying take the shorter road (less to |
| 16 |
> rename :-) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> so yeah, USE="postscript" it shall be unless someone objects... |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> - Samuli |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
This makes sense globally, +1 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
As mentioned some packages (graphviz comes to mind also) will need to |
| 26 |
keep 'gs' locally since it is used as a ghostscript-specific flag. |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk/bOMgACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBkmgD/W05LR/3OmEFmzba/x0YLjsP+ |
| 31 |
6UUzcPwxRbJ3ArjIza0A/1XgPGoecSrrqAKhLi2SiqyqpwolOw3MP+ol1Oa85/DP |
| 32 |
=iQRE |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives