Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Harley Peters <harley@×××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass.
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:34:49
Message-Id: 20090710063444.6214563b@parity.biterror.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass. by Christian Faulhammer
1 On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:50:26 +0200
2 Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Hi,
5 >
6 > Harley Peters <harley@×××××××××××××.net>:
7 > > Because the numbers don't look so good for Gnash.
8 > > bzr branch http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/gnash/trunk
9 >
10 > They look similar on my system to that of Emacs, although I have to
11 > try with new revisions added.
12 >
13 > > Having said that it's only a two line change to the bzr.eclass code
14 > > to get it to work the way I want.
15 > > And I can live with that. :)
16 >
17 > But in the end I need to justify the changes not only for you. :)
18 >
19 > V-Li
20 >
21
22 I'm getting good numbers from the command line but in the ebuild it's
23 much different.
24 I haven't timed it but it takes about 25 minutes to do a full
25 checkout and about a third that to do the light weight checkout.
26 The update takes less than a minute with the full checkout. And it
27 takes ten's of minutes with a lightweight checkout.
28
29 Is there something else in the ebuild I need to specify besides
30 EBZR_REPO_URI="http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/gnash/trunk" ?
31
32 You can download the ebuild at:
33 http://overlays.biterror.net/files/gnash-9999.ebuild

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Problems with the current bzr eclass. "René 'Necoro' Neumann" <lists@××××××.eu>