Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
Subject: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:28:14 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/23/2012 09:25 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Please discuss my arguments and come to the conclusions to 
>> RESO/WONT-FIX "testing git-cvsserver", make a "clean cut" and
>> remove this bug from the blockers of "[TRACKER] portage migration
>> to git".
>> 
> 
> +1
> 
> Please cut cvs support once and for all.
> 
+1 for clean cut
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk+85e4ACgkQVxOqA9G7/aDWpgD/SYfC3aOlOP2kAwK3qt81smH8
YWs60Kl77Xx+wIM1jx8A/0PkisxPTsLE5jR59GhaDmC+epoodW1GOak//pAvCmCG
=F8Rw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Replies:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Fabio Erculiani
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Andreas K. Huettel
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.