Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Spider <spider@g.o>
Subject: Re: FW: Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc)
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 17:48:16 +0100
begin  quote
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 15:23:26 +1100
"Todd Wright" <wylie@...> wrote:

> The ebuild I mentioned in the original post to this thread did state
> what had changed. In this case it was primarily the software version
> and some minor changes to cater for changes in the way it compiled. I
> can understand your frustration at users submitting an ebuild with no
> indication of what changed, however that was not what this thread was
> intended to discuss.
<SNIP>

I stand corrected.



//Spider
--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
Attachment:
pgpcx3lTED2I7.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
FW: Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc)
-- Todd Wright
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
FW: Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc)
Next by thread:
Gentoo for S/390 and zSeries
Previous by date:
Re: ACCEPT_KEYWORDS + bootstrap.sh
Next by date:
Re: ACCEPT_KEYWORDS + bootstrap.sh


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.