Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o>
From: dams@...
Subject: Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:12:41 +0200
Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o> said:

> On Tuesday 23 September 2003 03:08 pm, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>> There are other issues, too:
>
> <snip>
>
> I don't understand the logic behind blindly following a document like the FHS.  

FHS is made so that f*cking proprietary application get well installed on every
distribution, so that they can sell more, and make the big linux actors (IBM
and co), more rich.

If you agree with this way to let linux go forward (I have no opinion on that),
then be FHS compliant. It's certain that being FHS compliant is a plus when
dealing with proprietary software companies.

> If there are compelling reasons why a directory of installation path is 
> incorrect, then it needs to be addressed.  However, I can tell you that 99% 
> of Linux users have multiple directories underneath /mnt (cdrom, hd, 
> usbhd...).  This is a violation of the FHS.

-- 
dams

--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- Daniel Robbins
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- Kevin Lacquement
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- Luke-Jr
References:
gentoo vs. the FHS
-- aeriksson
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- Stanislav Brabec
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
-- Caleb Tennis
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
Next by thread:
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
Previous by date:
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS
Next by date:
Re: gentoo vs. the FHS


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.