| 1 |
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:16:13 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> What we *also* need is to document this requirements to let people |
| 4 |
> present that work directly instead of losing days figuring out what is |
| 5 |
> needed or what not |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The requirement is that the PMS team needs to be able to understand the |
| 8 |
proposal, and that someone needs to do however much work is necessary |
| 9 |
(which varies massively from proposal to proposal -- multilib is |
| 10 |
at least a thousand times more complicated than adding a new function |
| 11 |
that outputs stuff based upon a use flag) to be able to present it in a |
| 12 |
form acceptable to the Council. That's all there is to it. There is no |
| 13 |
lengthy form P123b.5 to fill in or anything like that. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives