| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:47:47 +0000
|
| 5 |
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
> On 12/17/2011 08:32 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:33:11 +0000 Markos Chandras |
| 8 |
> > <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> >> to avoid useless compilations to slow machines |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > That's a package manager issue, not an ebuild issue. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> How come? The package appears to have a lower version compared to the |
| 14 |
> previous one so the package manager treats it as a downgrade |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
No, the issue that you think there's such a thing as a "useless
|
| 17 |
compilation". Your package manager should provide you with an easy way
|
| 18 |
of saying "I don't care about this package this time when I'm updating
|
| 19 |
world, so exclude it if possible".
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- --
|
| 22 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk7shMsACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHcUQCeJ7GKQwkCBfOZwZ303PpoU5DZ
|
| 27 |
KNIAnReiJXKnMlXVJuThjL5+T4OJd8q5
|
| 28 |
=P9Bg
|
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives