Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@...>
Subject: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:25:45 +0200
The 01/06/12, Duncan wrote:

> But it seems to me that overlays are the primary use case for commits to 
> public trees other than gentoo first.  Otherwise, the whole rebase-vs-
> merge problem goes away, because the first public commit is to the gentoo 
> tree.  But especially with overlays (like kde) that have an overlay-
> first, test, then gentoo-tree, policy, that public overlay tree (which is 
> already in git) is part of the process.  Commits MUST go thru the overlay 
> to get to the tree, and that overlay is public, so constant rebasing is a 
> definite no-no.

The purpose of overlays is to have ebuilds maintained outside of the
official Gentoo portage. Importing a ebuild from an overlay whether it
uses Git or not means importing the ebuild(s). In the Git context, it
means the Gentoo maintainer has to make an import commit the same way
it would be done to start a project with somthing like:

  cp 'files to be commited' .
  git add .
  git commit -m 'initial import'

So, like explained before your concern is clearly out of the current
discussion. Importing commit history from Overlays is not supported and
will probably never be. Gentoo doesn't forces (and doesn't want to)
overlays maintainers to use Git.

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht


Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Andreas K. Huettel
References:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- William Hubbs
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- William Hubbs
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Package up for grabs: app-misc/gcal


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.