Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:57:21
Message-Id: 20080726145712.6b433c3a@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
1 On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:37:06 +0200
2 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > Mark Loeser (Halcy0n) (QA project leader) said on 2008-07-24 that
5 > this policy doesn't exist. I understand that bug reports about
6 > LDFLAGS being ignored are usually fixed, so I ask for the formal
7 > enacting of this policy.
8
9 Fair enough then. ;)
10
11
12 --
13 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
14 treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
15 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature