El dom, 04-12-2011 a las 17:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> On Sunday 04 December 2011 15:35:50 Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > Since there are quite a few packages that would need updates, I thought
> > about first mailing gentoo-dev for feedback and perhaps a first chunk of
> > work done. I also wouldn't mind creating bugreports for each of them, but
> > that would still be best done after having mailed gentoo-dev ;-)
> 
> i generally don't want to see bug reports that say "please add IUSE=selinux to 
> XXX package and add 'selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-XXX )' to *DEPEND".  if 
> selinux wants policies pulled in by packages based on USE=selinux, and that's 
> the only change needed, then feel free to commit the change yourself for any 
> toolchain / base-system / vapier package.  probably easiest to skip the 
> revbump and just commit to existing packages since selinux has been deadish 
> for quite sometime :P.

I fully agree with Mike here, feel free to change it in packages
maintained by me (I have seen bluez ;))

> 
> > games-board/aisleriot sec-policy/selinux-games
> 
> i don't see why this game is singled out.  if you have a selinux policy for 
> all games, then it sounds like we should add this logic to games.eclass.
> 
> > net-im/climm sec-policy/selinux-games
> 
> you sure about that one ?  this isn't a game (unless you count all forms of IM 
> a "game" :p).
> 
> and yes, this list really really should have been sent through `sort`
> -mike