1 |
El dom, 04-12-2011 a las 17:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió: |
2 |
> On Sunday 04 December 2011 15:35:50 Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
3 |
> > Since there are quite a few packages that would need updates, I thought |
4 |
> > about first mailing gentoo-dev for feedback and perhaps a first chunk of |
5 |
> > work done. I also wouldn't mind creating bugreports for each of them, but |
6 |
> > that would still be best done after having mailed gentoo-dev ;-) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> i generally don't want to see bug reports that say "please add IUSE=selinux to |
9 |
> XXX package and add 'selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-XXX )' to *DEPEND". if |
10 |
> selinux wants policies pulled in by packages based on USE=selinux, and that's |
11 |
> the only change needed, then feel free to commit the change yourself for any |
12 |
> toolchain / base-system / vapier package. probably easiest to skip the |
13 |
> revbump and just commit to existing packages since selinux has been deadish |
14 |
> for quite sometime :P. |
15 |
|
16 |
I fully agree with Mike here, feel free to change it in packages |
17 |
maintained by me (I have seen bluez ;)) |
18 |
|
19 |
> |
20 |
> > games-board/aisleriot sec-policy/selinux-games |
21 |
> |
22 |
> i don't see why this game is singled out. if you have a selinux policy for |
23 |
> all games, then it sounds like we should add this logic to games.eclass. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> > net-im/climm sec-policy/selinux-games |
26 |
> |
27 |
> you sure about that one ? this isn't a game (unless you count all forms of IM |
28 |
> a "game" :p). |
29 |
> |
30 |
> and yes, this list really really should have been sent through `sort` |
31 |
> -mike |