List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
El dom, 04-12-2011 a las 17:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> On Sunday 04 December 2011 15:35:50 Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > Since there are quite a few packages that would need updates, I thought
> > about first mailing gentoo-dev for feedback and perhaps a first chunk of
> > work done. I also wouldn't mind creating bugreports for each of them, but
> > that would still be best done after having mailed gentoo-dev ;-)
> i generally don't want to see bug reports that say "please add IUSE=selinux to
> XXX package and add 'selinux? ( sec-policy/selinux-XXX )' to *DEPEND". if
> selinux wants policies pulled in by packages based on USE=selinux, and that's
> the only change needed, then feel free to commit the change yourself for any
> toolchain / base-system / vapier package. probably easiest to skip the
> revbump and just commit to existing packages since selinux has been deadish
> for quite sometime :P.
I fully agree with Mike here, feel free to change it in packages
maintained by me (I have seen bluez ;))
> > games-board/aisleriot sec-policy/selinux-games
> i don't see why this game is singled out. if you have a selinux policy for
> all games, then it sounds like we should add this logic to games.eclass.
> > net-im/climm sec-policy/selinux-games
> you sure about that one ? this isn't a game (unless you count all forms of IM
> a "game" :p).
> and yes, this list really really should have been sent through `sort`
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)