| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Friday 09 April 2004 01:21, Jason Huebel wrote: |
| 5 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 6 |
> | On Wednesday 07 April 2004 02:51 pm, Meir Kriheli wrote: |
| 7 |
> |>Question is: Can there be more than one arch in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in a |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> single |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |>system (like: "~amd64 ~x86") ? Is such state legal at all ? |
| 12 |
> | |
| 13 |
> | should it be done ? no ... |
| 14 |
> | does it work ? yes ... users do it ... |
| 15 |
> | should it be supported ? no ... |
| 16 |
> | -mike |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> You get Gentoo for free. The least you can do is contribute something |
| 19 |
> back to the community, even something as simple as "keyword bugs"... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Not that users shouldn't be reporting back, but if gentoo-stats supports |
| 22 |
multiple keywords for ACCEPT_KEYWORDS regardless of what they are, this |
| 23 |
information could be pulled anyway. It doesn't necessarily need to be done by |
| 24 |
the gentoo-stats server, but if the server has an interface for pulling |
| 25 |
information, it could be done quite easily with a separate script. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iQCVAwUBQHV/FFoikN4/5jfsAQKu1wP/d4vVYCZ28TgbNvl2QFM+Wl0ccPWFqC/m |
| 33 |
evp92xl3Pb6eYdfp8LOEBpQLPSB2FZLn68lwetPsyfFCv3D+Bx/8vw0bLf5DzhkX |
| 34 |
7zKF2zcDevjsztJDoOdrW9Vh5to+1ngMlTFkQNgk7ZGkl9k3mR3fnwbY8Sa/wFJ5 |
| 35 |
L/GXNQ219Uk= |
| 36 |
=5uoV |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives