1 |
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 16:41:59 Mark Loeser wrote: |
2 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> said: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 23:08:24 Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
4 |
> > > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: |
5 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their |
8 |
> > > maintainers in Gentoo. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the month: how about bumpday |
12 |
> > > on the third Saturday of the month? First bumpday could be March 20th, |
13 |
> > > 10 days from now. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > What do you think? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > for the maintainer-needed ones, np. for the ones with maintainers, i |
18 |
> > think you need an ack from someone first. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I don't even think the maintainer-needed ones should be bumped. Who |
21 |
> knows what bugs you are introducing into the tree. This is why things |
22 |
> eventually get treecleaned. |
23 |
I run occasionally the maintainer-needed list and bump those packages ( and |
24 |
YES I try to do proper bumps not just renaming the ebuilds ), so yes |
25 |
maintainer-needed package could get some love as well :) |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
30 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
31 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org |