| 1 |
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 17:43 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote: |
| 2 |
> How about something in the "planet" format that where each group |
| 3 |
> reporting status could do so at their schedule when they feel an |
| 4 |
> update is necessary or warrented. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Then users could just read the website for the latest status updates. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> There are a few "hot" items many people are interested in such as kde |
| 9 |
> or gnome stablization, for example. A simple line like "Don't expect |
| 10 |
> KDE 5.0 to go stable before the end of the year" provides transparency |
| 11 |
> and a bit of communication to the user community. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Again, there's nothing wrong with that, but that isn't so much the sort |
| 14 |
of thing where the council is concerned. I was speaking more of |
| 15 |
long-term and short-term projects that directly affect the developers. |
| 16 |
I'm seeking more to improve inter-project communication, rather than |
| 17 |
developer-user communications. It isn't that I don't think dev-user |
| 18 |
communications are important, it is just that I don't see it as one of |
| 19 |
Gentoo's "problems" currently. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 23 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 24 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 25 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 26 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives