Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell,
> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for
> keeping these before i punt them ?
> -mike
>
Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break
backwards compatibility as long as an eclass exists?
Regards,
Petteri
|
| Replies: |
Re: portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?
-- Patrick Lauer
|
Re: portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?
-- Mike Frysinger
|
Re: portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?
-- Markos Chandras
|
| References: |
portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?
-- Mike Frysinger
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-dev:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? |
| Previous by date: |
| Lastrite: dev-scheme/plt-scheme (fails to compile and replaced by dev-scheme/racket) |
| Next by date: |
| Re: portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? |
|
