List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:01:55PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:55:42 +0300
> Markos Chandras <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Oh come on. I never said to stop supporting those arches. I just said
> > to shrink their stable tree. What do you suggest? Pretend to have
> > active exotic arches just to look shiny and pretty?
> Claiming to support an exotic arch but forcing people to run ~arch on
> it is not supporting it at all. One of the problems with exotic archs
> is that they are much more likely to show up bugs than things that are
> commonly used, and so knowing that something has been properly tested
> is a lot more important there.
> Ciaran McCreesh
Ok then according to your definition that supported arches == stable
tree, I can safely assume that we cannot support those arches
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer