| 1 |
On 03/18/2010 10:00 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
>> And do you want to add a special rule to portage just for the special case of python instead of the |
| 3 |
>> ebuilds/eclasses having the issue? |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> What issue is there with ebuilds/eclasses? Both should reflect the deps |
| 7 |
> as well as can be done with current EAPIs. If they don't, they need to |
| 8 |
> be fixed. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Regards, |
| 11 |
> Petteri |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I know about distutils.eclass: If an ebuild does just inherit it and does not define anything |
| 15 |
special, it will add "dev-lang/python" to the dependency tree, which will pull in python-3*, also |
| 16 |
noone knows, if it is requested, supported or will even work there (e.g. dev-util/protobuf does pull |
| 17 |
in python-3*, also i dont see any marks, that it does support python-3*). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Thomas Sachau |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives