1 |
Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> Also, maybe apply_user_patches_here should have a special return value |
3 |
> if there are no patches to be applied? That way, src_prepare can avoid |
4 |
> an eautoreconf call if there are no patches. |
5 |
|
6 |
Does that imply that every ebuild for an autotools-based package would |
7 |
be expected to have an "apply_user_patches_here && eautoreconf" line, |
8 |
just in case the user might want to add custom patches? It could be |
9 |
exported by autotools.eclass, but even so, requiring every autotools |
10 |
ebuild to inherit the eclass even if it doesn't have any effect by |
11 |
default seems a bit unfortunate. |