Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?

[Thomas T. Veldhouse]

Don't blame it on the west, Mr Smith :)

I wasn't [originally] trying to blame anybody, I was originally trying to
tell the person I thought had made the mistake (via the Changelog) to please
fix it asap (hence my direct CC) rather than have that person have to wait
and wade through the list.

No matter which longitude the attitude comes from, the bug needs fixing, but
more importantly, the bug should never have made into stable.  This really
should be an effort to shore up quality control, no blame attributed to
anybody in particular.  The result should be that a mistake is learned from,
not ignored.  Daniel says that it won't be ignored, so I am very happy with
that response.

Tom Veldhouse

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henti Smith" <bain@×××××××.za>
To: "Daniel Robbins" <drobbins@g.o>
Cc: <veldy@×××××.net>; <aurelien@×××××.org>; <kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr>;
<gentoo-dev@g.o>; <manson@g.o>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?


> On 17 Dec 2002 09:10:23 -0700
> Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> wrote:
>
> > I really dislike this whole theme of finding the "culprit," since I
> > don't think it's helpful. If you're interested, you can view the
> > ChangeLogs here:
>
> A typical western attitude. Something is broken/wrong find somebody to
blame.
> Addapt an eastern attidute. Something is broken/wrong fix it no need to
blame anybody
>
> Henti Smith
>
>


--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list