From: | Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org> |
---|---|
To: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
Cc: | Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay |
Date: | Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:23:31 |
Message-Id: | 4A8AE178.3060007@hartwork.org |
1 | Hi there! |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | With the GSoC deadline behind me I took the liberty to put a few hours |
5 | into something Funtoo-related that I've been wanting to do before. |
6 | |
7 | Funtoo's tree is a melting pot currently combining ebuilds from the |
8 | trees (from [1]) |
9 | |
10 | - gentoo |
11 | - mpd |
12 | - perl-experimental |
13 | - sunrise |
14 | |
15 | with |
16 | |
17 | - Funtoo-only ebuilds |
18 | - version bumps |
19 | |
20 | |
21 | >From a Funtoo perspective it makes sense to keep it all in one |
22 | repository. Still, wouldn't it be nice to have .. |
23 | |
24 | an overlay with stuff that's available in Funtoo only? |
25 | |
26 | I've been working on a tool ("funtoo-ripper" [2], written in Python) to |
27 | automate dissection and keeping a dedicated overlay ("pure-funtoo" [3]) |
28 | in sync. Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is |
29 | manual at the moment. |
30 | |
31 | |
32 | A nice pure-funtoo summary will be auto-added to |
33 | |
34 | http://gentoo-overlays.zugaina.org/pure-funtoo |
35 | |
36 | soon I guess. |
37 | |
38 | |
39 | I hope this overlay enables collaboration on a level that was |
40 | technically difficult so far. I'm curious how it turns out. |
41 | |
42 | So long, |
43 | |
44 | |
45 | |
46 | Sebastian |
47 | |
48 | |
49 | [1] http://funtoo.org/en/articles/funtoo/quick-install-howto/ |
50 | [2] http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=funtoo-ripper.git;a=summary |
51 | [3] http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=pure-funtoo.git;a=summary |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay | Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay | Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net> |