| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Philipp Riegger wrote: |
| 5 |
> Hello world! |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:24 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 8 |
>> Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: |
| 9 |
>>> As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages. We could move the |
| 10 |
>>> 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category (eselect |
| 11 |
>>> itself would stay in app-admin). |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> Opinions? |
| 14 |
>> Yes in general. Maybe think about what happens when the Universal |
| 15 |
>> Select Tool gets released/used. Possible alternative: app-select? |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> How will that tool be called? Maybe uselect? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Another alternative: app-xselect. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
seems like here two-level categories are a limitation. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
if three-level categories were available, I'd say app-admin-xselect. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
since the last two levels make more sense, compared to the 1+3, if you |
| 28 |
believe the app-admin category is too crowded, why not just make a new |
| 29 |
category admin-XYZ, thus adding the missing third level? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
- -- |
| 32 |
Federico Ferri (mescalinum) |
| 33 |
> Philipp |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 39 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 40 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkocAeQACgkQV/B5axfzrPv12gCeO8tVVCvJcqb0OK4qsFBxELe3 |
| 43 |
VuoAoKub0H7s1u0yvPR9n4DSNeKmN+rE |
| 44 |
=dovF |
| 45 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives