Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Yeah, but it should show the version that it's actually upgrading, not the
version that's in a different SLOT. Maybe I'll take a look at the Portage
code, and come up with a patch later.
Jon Portnoy said:
> Recent versions of Portage will show UD for packages that're actually
> going to be downgraded and just U when they're in different SLOTs, I
> think.
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:56:52AM -0700, Matthew Walker wrote:
>> Then I'd like to propose a new feature for portage. ;)
>>
>> There is no visual indication in the output of emerge -pu world that
>> tells me those are in different slots. And since I apparently still have
>> a 1.4 panel version installed, shouldn't it show /that/ as the package
>> it's upgrading?
>>
>> Jon Portnoy said:
>> > It's safe. They're in different SLOTs.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:50:13AM -0700, Matthew Walker wrote:
>> >> Is there some reason gnome-panel wants to downgrade from version
>> 2.2.1 to version 1.4.2-r2? Is it safe to let it downgrade?
>> >>
>> >> I've been avoiding letting portage 'update' gnome-panel for a while
>> now, but I'm getting tired of it, and want to know what I should do.
>> >>
>> >> Matthew
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jon Portnoy
>> >
>> > --
>> > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
>
> --
> Jon Portnoy
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
|
|