| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
hi, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 01:08, Dylan Carlson wrote: |
| 9 |
> On Monday 27 January 2003 06:42 pm, Jan Winhuysen wrote: |
| 10 |
> > Hello everyone! |
| 11 |
> > Is there a future plan to split the kde source packages into ebuilds for |
| 12 |
> > single applications? Debian had this once, when it was on my box. I |
| 13 |
> > think this would be a good idea, but I don't have the know-how to do |
| 14 |
> > it... |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It's all done via Makefiles in the source distribution mostly. Getting |
| 17 |
> this solved is a matter of convincing some people that this issue matters |
| 18 |
> to enough users, and in turn finding the right way to put it in. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Cervisia is (afaik) the only thing that exists independently of any KDE |
| 21 |
> bundle at this moment. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Please refer to the existing bug on this issue. Please add your comments |
| 24 |
> and CC: yourself to it. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11123 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I don't think this is a good idea. |
| 29 |
On RedHat distribution you got this foolish system (of course binary |
| 30 |
packages). |
| 31 |
You don't know which application is in the normal kde distribution or just a |
| 32 |
plain application like whatever. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
If you see kde as one complete desktop enviroment, then you let kde as is |
| 35 |
(compiling all applications in one package the same time), there aren't a lot |
| 36 |
of patches for kde in the last few months, so we can live with it as is. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
regards, |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
\sh |
| 41 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 42 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
iD8DBQE+Nf+7V8AnusWiV6wRAr3RAKDOscWdRsT7AekHSNFpNqNseuUMUwCgxqNF |
| 45 |
RdUp+eaNzh+5z8uXWwrhoXs= |
| 46 |
=VFeK |
| 47 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives