1 |
On 2009-11-04, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Pacho Ramos wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> El mié, 04-11-2009 a las 15:48 -0600, Dale escribió: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> Ben de Groot wrote: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> 2009/11/4 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>>> Is it possible to just mask and maybe keyword KDE 3? |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> This has already been decided. We are moving it to an overlay. I |
14 |
>>>> can't think of a valid reason why you would not use that overlay. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> Because I don't want one more thing to have to deal with. Gentoo |
17 |
>>> is enough fun already. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> But, why do you think having kde3 stuff hardmasked in main tree |
20 |
>> in unmaintained state will be better than having it on a external |
21 |
>> overlay? :-/ |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> Also, think about gnome users (like me) that will not need to |
24 |
>> download all kde3 ebuilds on every sync :-) Yes, maybe they aren't |
25 |
>> so much but I still fail to see why do you think that preserving |
26 |
>> kde3 hardmasked is better than using an overlay |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Because I am not familiar with overlays. I have never used one and |
29 |
> hope to keep it that way. If it was hardmasked, just run autounmask |
30 |
> kde-meta:3.5 or something similar and carry on. |
31 |
|
32 |
"I am not familiar with autounmask. I have never used it and hope to |
33 |
keep it that way. If it was in an overlay, just run layman -a kde3 or |
34 |
something similar and carry on." |