Re: [gentoo-dev] debugging pan crash

[Gold is Heavy]

On Thursday 11 October 2001 10:03 am, James M Long wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 20:06:59 -0400
>
> Gold is Heavy <aeoo@×××××××.org> wrote:
> > [pan is broken message snipped]
> I am surprised that no one has looked at the pan website itself. It clearly

I did read it.  Why did you think I did not?

> shows that it needs the following libraries: gtk+ 1.2.10 or higher
> libxml 1.8.11 or higher
> gdk-pixbuf 0.10.1 or higher and unforunately...
> gnome-libs 1.0.16 or higher

$ cd /var/db/pkg
$ find . | grep -i "gtk\+.*ebuild$"
./x11-libs/gtk+-1.2.10-r4/gtk+-1.2.10-r4.ebuild
$ find . | grep -i "libxml.*ebuild$"
./dev-libs/libxml2-2.4.1/libxml2-2.4.1.ebuild
./dev-libs/libxml-1.8.16/libxml-1.8.16.ebuild
$ find . | grep -i "pixbuf.*ebuild$"
./media-libs/gdk-pixbuf-0.11.0-r1/gdk-pixbuf-0.11.0-r1.ebuild
$ find . | grep -i "gnome-libs.*ebuild$"
./gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.1.2-r1/gnome-libs-1.4.1.2-r1.ebuild

> Also of note is the message:
> Pan does not require the GNOME desktop.  It can be used in other
> desktops/window managers such as KDE, AfterStep, WindowMaker, etc. if the
> prerequisite libraries are installed. So there you go, it is basically a
> gnome app that can run under various other WM's and DE's... (Like most of
> the other gnome apps.)

All this info, btw, is also in the README file.

>
> I would suggest unmerging PAN, then emerging the above libs and then
> emerging PAN again. It seems from a quick glance at the ebuild files...
> that emerging gtkhtml would be wise also, due to the fact that the ebuild
> is for version 0.10 of PAN which still uses gtkhtml to do inline images...

Uh, it looks like gtkhtml is masked, and I don't feel like merging a masked 
package, because it was probably masked for a good reason.  Plus, pan's site 
doesn't require it.

> Let me know if there is anything else that needs to be explained or looked
> at.

--Leo