Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stelian Ionescu <sionescu@××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:37:10
Message-Id: 1331685395.3561.1.camel@cathai
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 by Joshua Kinard
1 On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 20:29 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
2 > On 03/13/2012 05:14, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
3 >
4 > >
5 > > And besides, genkernel and dracut are automatized; they *are* the
6 > > simple (and proper, IMHO) solution.
7 >
8 >
9 > My contention is that I shouldn't need an initramfs loaded into my kernel to
10 > get my system into a minimally-usable state. I've been running separate
11 > /usr setups for 10+ years, and only now, such a setup breaks, hence my beef
12 > with Fedora's assertion that such a setup is wrong.
13
14 You simply misunderstood their point
15
16 --
17 Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
18 Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
19 http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature