1 |
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 09:49, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 21 September 2004 15:15, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 15:47, John Davis wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 18:41 +0200, Benjamin Judas wrote: |
5 |
> > > > What do you think about it and how do you think this should be solved? |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > I'd say go ahead and remove it from the stages. IIRC, the acl use in the |
8 |
> > > stages is a hold over from the 1.4 days. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > This means users will not be able to install using ext2/3/reiserfs/xfs |
11 |
> > with acl support. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> While I don't see any problems keeping acl, it is no problem at all to enable |
14 |
> acl's on those filesystems after installation. The default stages do not |
15 |
> contain acl's in any case so any advantage for installing on an acl enabled |
16 |
> filesystem are not there. |
17 |
|
18 |
The user would have to: |
19 |
USE=acl emerge coreutils rsync |
20 |
|
21 |
before they could use any acl, but I believe that they should be able to |
22 |
enable it in the kernel without having to have USE=acl... can anyone |
23 |
confirm this? If not, I'll have to get some testing done on it. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Chris Gianelloni |
27 |
Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager |
28 |
Games - Developer |
29 |
Gentoo Linux |
30 |
|
31 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |